Gene Stratton-Porter |
In my post last week, I wrote about
discovering a book that had belonged to my 2x Great-Grandma. It was meaningful
to me because I am a booklover. I was more excited to discover that the author,
Gene Stratton-Porter, had been born Geneva Grace Stratton, and was a woman. Then,
researching the book and the author led to the discovery that she was an early and
avid naturalist, writing her books of fiction, ripe with a wealth of knowledge
of the doings of the natural world, so that she could support her books and
articles of non-fiction.
This voice from the past was more
than just a connection to one of my ancestors. I see the effects of cutting
down forest to build more city as the deer and coy dog populations become more
and more visible in my city. The sight of eagles and hawks within the limits is
becoming so common as to not be a novelty anymore. Why is that? Because their
homes are disappearing for the sake of our comforts. It was both heartening and
heartbreaking to discover Gene Stratton-Porter’s own words on the loss of her
beloved natural world, almost a hundred years ago.
I found a description of her from
biographer Frederic Cooper: “Gene
Stratton-Porter lives in a swamp, arrays herself in man’s clothes, and sallies
forth in all weathers to study the secrets of nature. I believe she knows every
bug, bird, and beast in the woods… She is primarily a naturalist, one of the
foremost in America and has published a number of books on flora and fauna…”
Voices from the
Ancestors
The Limberlost marsh in Indiana was
a favored place of the author at one period of her life, reflected in several
of her books, most popularly in A Girl of
the Limberlost. She was devastated when the trees and natural habitats of
her animal friends were cleared to make room for farmland. And she watched in
despair as oil drilling destroyed the marshlands. She spoke out against it,
even though her husband owned many oil rigs.
Gene Stratton-Porter wrote several
essays on environmental issues in a book, Let
Us Highly Resolve, printed posthumously, in 1927. She watched her beloved
swamplands get cleared for farming and oil. In her article “Shall We Save Our
Natural Beauty?” she says: “The deer and
fur-bearing animals are practically gone from the country I knew… The birds
have been depleted in numbers until it is quite impossible to raise fruit of
any kind without a continuous fight against slugs and aphis… With the cutting
of timber has come a change in climate; weeks of drought in the summer…and
winters so stringently cold that the fruit trees are killed outright. The even temperature
and the rains every three or four days which we knew in childhood are things of
the past…it has become necessary for the sons of men who wasted the woods and
the waters to put in overhead sprinkling systems… windmills and irrigation are
becoming common…as a nation, [we] have already, in the most wanton and reckless
waste the world has ever known, changed our climate conditions and wasted a
good part of our splendid heritage. The question now facing us is whether we
shall do all that lies in our power to save comfortable living conditions for
ourselves and the spots of natural beauty that remain for our children… If this
is to be done, a nation-wide movement must be begun immediately…there may not
be coal and iron, at the rate we are using it, to supply future generations…
Certainly to plant trees and preserve trees, to preserve water, and to do all
in our power to save every natural resource, both from the standpoint of
utility and beauty, is a work that every man and woman should give immediate and
earnest attention.”
Gene wrote her articles in the
hopes of sharing the “often-overlooked beauty and complexity of wildlife.” She
regarded it more highly than the social affairs and proprieties she saw within
her world. Of the loss of habitat in the Limberlost marsh, she notes the
inevitable climate change: “They had
forgotten that draining the water from all these acres of swamp land would dry
and heat the air… and they had not figured out for themselves how much rainfall
they would take from their crops… [A]s the forests fell, the creeks and springs
dried up… the work of changing the climatic conditions of a world was underway…
the fur-bearing animals and all kinds of game birds were being driven farther and
farther…”
I hear her words, and I think of my
love of the green wilds. A friend of mine says that when she was growing up,
her family home was in one of the first suburbs at the edge of a wood, a wood that
stretched for miles behind them. Thirty-five years later, there are no woods to
be seen at all. Nothing but more suburbs and sprawling spaces of dried grasses.
I am not a scientist. I don’t have facts and figures. I don’t feel the need to
prove we are damaging the Earth. Her resources are finite. That is a surety. How
many generations of voices need to ring out before we find the strength to make
the changes necessary for the continued survival of all life on the planet? For we are all relations.
No comments:
Post a Comment